« Ask and you would have received | Home | Derek McGovern tips Ellen Feldman for Orange Prize »

Man U odds against? Get on!

By Matt | May 20, 2009

THE SILLY season has come early in the oddsmaking industry, it seems. A raft of layers has priced up relegation-threatened Hull City’s must-win game at home to Manchester United and decided that Man U will roll over and let the Tigers beat them.

They’ve taken leave of their senses and should be punished for this foolishness. Odds of up to 7/5 can and should be snapped up about United winning the game.

In fairness, the bookies are only reacting to the popular misconceptions that a) Ferguson will rest players ahead of next Wednesday’s Champions League final, and b) a team with everything to play for will beat one with nothing at stake.

Both beliefs have no basis in fact but make for good newspaper stories like this one in today’s Currant.
Let’s take each misconception in turn:

Put it this way: if this game took place in the middle of the season, with the teams in the same places, would United be odds against? No. They’d be 1/3 or shorter; un-backable, in fact. And you wouldn’t blame the bookies for protecting themselves.

However, the bookies think that we’re going to think that Hull can somehow do something they haven’t done for half a season and raise their game – against the League Champions, no less. Which brings us to probably the strongest argument for backing Man U:

Yes, the likes of Craig Fagan and Andy Dawson might run about a bit more because of the severity of the situation. But being in their position won’t help them any more than it helped Sunderland on Monday night, or Middlesbrough against Aston Villa (a team with ‘nothing to play for’) and Newcastle at home to Fulham on Saturday.

It’s a foolish idea. Let’s ignore the hype and sentiment, follow the facts, and win some money.

Selection

Topics: Football betting No Comments »

Subscribe with Bloglines Add to Technorati Favorites


Read more on this subject in related books at Amazon.comor try some of these other articles:

Comments